Best hospitality ERP software for multi-property groups

The best hospitality ERP software for multi-property groups includes Flow ERP, Sage Intacct, NetSuite, Infor CloudSuite Hospitality, and Acumatica — but the right choice depends heavily on your ownership structure, property count, and how your management company and ownership entities are organized.

That distinction matters because the finance stack for a multi-property operator is more layered than it looks. Most generic ERP platforms are not pre-configured for USALI compliance, management fee accounting, or per-property P&L rollups. Selecting the wrong platform means months of configuration work, a close process that still relies on manual entries, and consolidated reporting that requires a separate tool to produce.

This guide is written for CFOs, Controllers, and finance leaders at hospitality management companies and hotel ownership groups managing multiple properties. It covers the five requirements that actually differentiate platforms at scale, an honest platform-by-platform evaluation, and a decision framework for matching your specific situation to the right system — including what to watch for when a vendor's demo doesn't reflect your operational reality.

Key takeaways

• Hospitality ERP for multi-property groups must produce per-property P&L and consolidated portfolio reporting simultaneously — general-purpose accounting software like QuickBooks cannot do either at scale, and single-property tools do not support the separate legal entity structure that most hotel ownership groups require.
• PMS integration (Opera, Mews, Cloudbeds, Stayntouch) is not optional — without a certified, maintained connector between the property management system and the ERP, nightly revenue data must be entered manually, which makes a reliable multi-property close process operationally impossible.
• USALI (Uniform System of Accounts for the Lodging Industry) is the industry-standard financial reporting framework for hotels, organizing revenue and expenses by department. Most generic ERP platforms do not support it natively — only Infor CloudSuite Hospitality ships with a pre-built USALI chart of accounts; others require configuration work that adds weeks to implementation.
• In hospitality, the entity that owns a property and the entity that operates it are frequently separate legal entities, which generates intercompany management fees, royalties, and shared services charges that must be calculated, invoiced, and eliminated in consolidation — a layer of complexity most general-purpose ERPs are not pre-configured to handle.
• Implementation timeline is a meaningful differentiator: a well-scoped hospitality ERP rollout for a 10-property group typically takes 4–9 months. Any vendor promising completion in under 90 days without a named, phased methodology is a red flag, not a selling point.
• The right platform depends on whether the buyer is a management company, an ownership group, or both — Flow ERP and Sage Intacct are better fits for management company reporting workflows, while NetSuite and Infor CloudSuite Hospitality are better suited to large enterprise groups with global operations or deep operational module requirements.

What is hospitality ERP software for multi-property groups?

Hospitality ERP software for multi-property groups is a financial management platform that consolidates accounting, reporting, and operational finance data across multiple hotel properties into a single system of record — while simultaneously producing individual property-level financials for each location. It is distinct from single-property accounting tools, which cannot aggregate across legal entities, and from property management systems (PMS), which handle reservations and guest operations rather than financial accounting.

"Multi-property" means something specific in this context: separate legal entities, separate bank accounts, separate P&Ls, and often separate ownership structures that must be reported both individually and in aggregate. A 12-property hotel group is not simply one business with 12 locations — it is typically 12 distinct accounting entities, each with its own chart of accounts, close process, and reporting obligations, that must also roll up into a coherent portfolio view for owners, lenders, and asset managers.

This platform category does the financial accounting work that sits above the PMS and below the investor reporting layer. It does not manage reservations, room inventory, or guest data — and it does not replace the operational systems that do. For a broader look at how multi-entity financial consolidation works across industries, the best multi-entity consolidation software guide for 2026 covers the underlying mechanics in detail.

Why hospitality ERP is not the same as a PMS

A property management system handles the operational side of running a hotel: reservations, front-desk check-in, room inventory, housekeeping status, and guest profiles. An ERP handles the financial backbone — general ledger, accounts payable, accounts receivable, financial reporting, and consolidation across entities. They are complementary systems, not interchangeable ones.

The ERP receives data from the PMS — nightly revenue, occupancy statistics, food and beverage charges — and processes that data into financial records. The PMS generates the transactions; the ERP accounts for them. Neither system replaces the other, and a hospitality finance stack without both in place is structurally incomplete.

To make this concrete: a 15-property management company might run Mews as its PMS across all properties and Sage Intacct as its ERP. Mews captures reservation data and nightly revenue at each property; Intacct consolidates that revenue into property-level and portfolio-level financials. The two systems serve different masters — operations and finance — and the integration between them is where the close process either works or breaks down.

The hospitality finance stack: how the layers connect

The framework that governs how data moves through a multi-property hospitality organization can be named precisely: The Hospitality Finance Stack. It has three layers, and each one depends on the one below it functioning correctly.

The first layer is PMS and POS — the operational data capture layer. This is where revenue is recorded at the property level: room revenue from the PMS, food and beverage revenue from POS systems like Oracle Simphony or Toast, and ancillary charges from spa or parking systems. The second layer is the ERP — the financial system of record. This is where nightly data from the PMS is translated into journal entries, posted to the general ledger, and organized into property-level P&Ls. The third layer is consolidation and FP&A — the group-level reporting layer where individual property financials are aggregated, intercompany transactions are eliminated, and portfolio-level reporting is produced for ownership groups and asset managers.

Breakdowns at any layer cascade upward. If the PMS integration to the ERP is unreliable or requires manual intervention, the close process at the portfolio level is compromised — and no amount of consolidation tooling fixes a data problem that originates at layer one. For finance leaders evaluating whether their current architecture is fit for purpose, best software for multi-location financial reporting provides a useful comparison of how different platforms handle the consolidation layer specifically.

What makes hospitality ERP selection different from standard ERP selection

A CFO who has evaluated ERP for a manufacturing company or professional services firm will find that the hospitality context introduces requirements that simply do not exist in most other industries. The evaluation criteria are not just different in degree — they are different in kind. Three structural differences drive this gap: a mandatory industry-specific reporting standard, a more complex intercompany structure than most multi-entity businesses face, and a hard dependency on operational software integration that has no equivalent in most ERP evaluations.

Understanding these differences before entering vendor conversations is what separates a well-scoped hospitality ERP evaluation from one that produces a platform mismatch. For a broader view of how multi-entity ERP selection works across industries, the best multi-entity consolidation software guide for 2026 covers the foundational evaluation criteria that apply regardless of vertical.

USALI compliance: what it is and why it matters for ERP selection

The Uniform System of Accounts for the Lodging Industry (USALI) is a standardized chart of accounts and financial reporting framework specific to hotels. It organizes revenue and expenses by department — Rooms, Food & Beverage, Spa, Undistributed Operating Expenses, Fixed Charges — and defines the structure that ownership groups, lenders, and asset managers expect when reviewing hotel P&Ls.

This matters for ERP selection because USALI compliance is not something you can approximate with a generic chart of accounts. An ERP that ships without a USALI-native chart of accounts forces the finance team to build one from scratch — a process that adds weeks to implementation and creates long-term reconciliation risk every time the platform updates or a new property is onboarded. The distinction between a platform that includes a pre-built USALI structure and one that describes USALI compliance as "configurable" is a meaningful differentiator, not a minor implementation detail.

Among the platforms covered in this guide, Infor CloudSuite Hospitality supports USALI natively. Sage Intacct, NetSuite, and Acumatica require configuration work to achieve USALI-formatted reporting. This difference should appear explicitly in your vendor evaluation scorecard.

Management company vs. ownership group accounting: why intercompany complexity is higher in hospitality

In most multi-entity businesses, intercompany transactions are relatively contained — shared services charges, intercompany loans, occasional asset transfers. In hospitality, the entity structure is more layered by design. The entity that owns the property (an ownership group or REIT) is typically legally separate from the entity that operates it (the management company), which may itself be separate from the brand licensor. Each relationship generates its own intercompany transaction stream: management fees calculated as a percentage of revenue or GOP, brand royalties, shared services allocations.

Each of those transaction types must be calculated, invoiced, tracked at the entity level, and then eliminated in consolidation so they do not inflate portfolio-level revenue. A management company running 15 properties under three different ownership structures can generate dozens of intercompany invoices per month — none of which can be handled manually at scale without compromising the close process. This is a materially higher volume of intercompany complexity than a comparably sized manufacturing or services business would face, and it requires an ERP with native intercompany automation, not just the ability to post manual journal entries.

For finance leaders who want to understand the mechanics of how these transactions are recorded and eliminated, the intercompany transactions guide covers the due-to/due-from structure and elimination workflow in detail.

PMS integration dependency: why this changes the ERP evaluation entirely

In a standard ERP evaluation, integration questions focus on HR systems, CRM platforms, or procurement tools. In hospitality, the integration question that determines whether the ERP is operationally viable is: does this platform have a certified, maintained connection to the property management system the buyer actually runs?

Nightly revenue, occupancy statistics, and RevPAR data must flow from the PMS — Opera, Mews, Cloudbeds, Stayntouch — into the ERP automatically. Without that integration, property-level revenue data must be entered manually for each property, each night, across the entire portfolio. For a 10-property group, that manual process breaks the close within months. The PMS integration is not a nice-to-have feature to negotiate during contracting; it is a binary requirement that should be confirmed — with specificity about certification status and maintenance ownership — before a platform advances past the demo stage.

Hospitality-specific ERP requirements: the five criteria that matter most

The following framework — The Five Multi-Property Hospitality Finance Requirements — is the evaluation checklist a CFO or Controller should apply when scoring any ERP platform under consideration for a multi-property group. Generic ERP evaluation criteria will not surface the gaps that matter in hospitality; these five criteria will.

Per-property P&L and consolidated portfolio reporting

The ERP must produce two views simultaneously: a standalone P&L for each property and a consolidated portfolio view across the entire group. The property-level P&L supports operator accountability, lender reporting, and asset management reviews. The consolidated view serves ownership group reporting and FP&A.

This dual-view requirement is not a standard feature in general-purpose accounting software. It requires either native multi-entity architecture or a purpose-built consolidation module — and the distinction between the two matters significantly at close time. For a deeper look at how multi-entity consolidation architecture differs across platforms, see best multi-entity consolidation software for 2026.

USALI-compliant chart of accounts and reporting structure

A USALI-compliant chart of accounts organizes revenue and expense lines by department: Rooms, Food & Beverage, Other Operated Departments, Undistributed Operating Expenses, and Fixed Charges. This departmental structure is the industry-standard P&L format expected by asset managers, lenders, and ownership groups — and it is materially different from a generic GL structure.

The practical distinction buyers must make: some platforms ship with a USALI chart of accounts pre-built, while others require the finance team to construct it from scratch. The latter adds weeks to implementation and creates long-term maintenance risk every time the chart needs to be updated or a new property is onboarded.

PMS integration: Opera, Mews, Cloudbeds, and Stayntouch

PMS integration is a non-negotiable requirement, not a configuration option. Nightly revenue, occupancy statistics, and RevPAR data must flow from the property management system into the ERP automatically — at scale, across every property — for the close process to remain manageable.

The major PMS platforms buyers should probe in vendor conversations are Opera (Oracle), Mews, Cloudbeds, and Stayntouch. "Integration available" is not a sufficient answer. Buyers should ask whether the integration is certified, bidirectional, maintained by the ERP vendor directly, and tested against the specific PMS version currently in production at their properties.

Management fee, royalty, and intercompany accounting

Management fees — typically calculated as a percentage of revenue or gross operating profit — must be calculated, invoiced, and eliminated in consolidation, often across multiple legal entities with different ownership structures. This requires the ERP to support intercompany transaction automation, not just manual journal entries at month-end.

Groups managing ten or more properties cannot sustain a manual intercompany process at scale. The close cycle absorbs the cost of every unautomated step, and the risk of elimination errors compounds with each additional entity. For context on how multi-location financial reporting platforms handle intercompany workflows differently, the architecture differences are meaningful.

F&B outlet cost tracking integrated with POS

For hotel groups with significant food and beverage operations, the ERP must receive cost and revenue data from POS systems — Toast, Lightspeed, Oracle Simphony — at the outlet level, not as a single aggregated F&B line. Outlet-level profitability reporting requires cost-center granularity that many mid-market ERPs simply do not provide.

This is where the gap between hospitality-specific and general-purpose platforms becomes most visible. A platform may consolidate room revenue cleanly across all properties while producing only a blended F&B number that obscures which outlets are profitable and which are not — a reporting failure that directly affects operational decision-making.

Platform-by-platform evaluation

What follows is the detailed assessment behind the comparison table presented earlier in this guide. Each platform receives equal structural treatment: a positioning statement, what it does well for multi-property hospitality groups, and an explicit contraindicator. No platform is presented without honest limitations.

Flow ERP

Flow ERP is an AI-native multi-entity ERP built for physical business operators — including hospitality management companies that need unified financial consolidation across multiple property entities. Its native intercompany elimination engine, consolidated AP/AR, and real-time multi-entity reporting architecture address the core financial problem facing hotel management groups: producing per-property P&L and portfolio-level consolidated financials from a single system without manual reconciliation at month-end.

Flow ERP's parent company, LiveFlow, holds a 4.9/5 stars on G2, with customers citing "automated, real-time data sync" as the most impactful capability — a meaningful proof point for management companies closing books across 10 or more properties simultaneously. Implementation timelines are measured in weeks rather than months, which reduces the operational disruption risk that plagues multi-property ERP rollouts during peak periods.

Not ideal for: single-property operators, or groups that need deep property management functionality — room inventory, reservations, or front-desk operations — beyond financial consolidation and multi-entity reporting.

Sage Intacct

Sage Intacct is a finance-first multi-entity platform with a dimensions-based reporting model that hospitality management companies use for portfolio reporting and management fee tracking across owned and managed assets. Its native multi-entity consolidation, automated intercompany eliminations, and flexible dimensional GL — which allows slicing financials by property, department, ownership entity, or cost center simultaneously — make it a practical fit for management companies running 10–50 properties with complex ownership structures. For a broader view of how Intacct's consolidation architecture compares across industries, see the best multi-entity consolidation software guide.

Not ideal for: groups that require USALI-native reporting without significant configuration work, or operators who want a single platform handling both operational and financial data without partner-led customization.

NetSuite

NetSuite's OneWorld module provides multi-subsidiary consolidation, multi-currency support, and intercompany elimination within a single system — capabilities that scale well for larger hotel groups with global operations, complex corporate structures, or international subsidiaries. Its breadth of operational modules and large implementation partner ecosystem make it the default starting point for enterprise-scale hospitality organizations that need ERP to extend beyond finance into procurement, HR, and asset management.

The tradeoff is well-documented: implementations routinely run 6–12 months, and total first-year cost — including the base license, OneWorld add-on, and implementation consulting — typically reaches $150,000 to $300,000 or more. USALI compliance requires configuration rather than out-of-the-box support, which adds implementation scope.

Not ideal for: mid-market hotel groups where implementation complexity and licensing cost exceed the operational benefit relative to more purpose-fit alternatives.

Infor CloudSuite Hospitality

Infor CloudSuite Hospitality is the most purpose-built option in this comparison for large hospitality enterprises. Native USALI compliance, F&B cost control at the outlet level, and pre-built PMS connectors are genuine differentiators that eliminate the configuration work required on every other platform in this guide. For an enterprise hotel group with 50+ properties, dedicated IT resources, and deep F&B operations, the hospitality-specific depth justifies the investment.

That depth comes with corresponding implementation complexity. Projects at enterprise scale typically require 12+ months and a dedicated IT team to configure, integrate, and maintain — a resource requirement that mid-market groups operating with lean finance teams cannot realistically absorb.

Not ideal for: mid-market groups without dedicated IT resources for implementation and ongoing system maintenance, or organizations that need to go live within a 6-month window.

Acumatica

Acumatica is a flexible mid-market ERP with solid multi-entity capabilities and a consumption-based licensing model — no per-user fees — that can be cost-effective for growing hotel groups adding properties and staff at pace. Its modern UI and multi-company accounting support make it a viable consideration for operators replacing fragmented property-level accounting tools.

Hospitality-specific depth is limited compared to Infor. USALI-native reporting is not available out of the box; building a compliant chart of accounts and departmental P&L structure requires partner-led configuration, which adds implementation time and long-term maintenance overhead.

Not ideal for: groups that require USALI-native reporting or deep hospitality-specific operational modules without significant partner-led customization.

Red flags to watch for in a hospitality ERP evaluation

If you are actively evaluating platforms for a multi-property hotel group, the following warning signs are worth treating as disqualifiers — not negotiating points. Hospitality ERP evaluations fail most often not because buyers chose the wrong platform, but because they accepted vague vendor answers to questions that deserved specific ones. For broader context on how these evaluation patterns apply across multi-entity finance platforms, see the best multi-entity consolidation software guide for 2026.

• The platform has no native multi-entity P&L — consolidated reporting requires a separate tool, add-on module, or manual export that is not included in the base platform price. This is not a configuration issue; it is a structural limitation that will compound every month-end close.
• The vendor cannot confirm a certified PMS integration for the systems you currently run — whether that is Opera, Mews, Cloudbeds, or Stayntouch. "We can build it" is a project commitment, not a product feature. Ask specifically whether the integration is certified, bidirectional, and maintained by the ERP vendor or a third party, and request documentation.
• USALI compliance is described as "configurable" without the vendor naming which chart of accounts structure is pre-built, which departmental lines are included out of the box, and how many implementation hours that configuration requires. "Configurable" in this context often means your finance team will build the USALI structure from scratch — adding weeks to implementation and creating ongoing maintenance risk.
• The vendor cannot reference hospitality management company customers at your property count. A reference at three properties is not evidence of capability at fifteen or twenty. Ask for customers who are operating at your scale, with a similar ownership structure, and who are willing to speak directly about the close process.
• An implementation timeline under 90 days is promised for a multi-property group without a clear phased methodology, named milestones, and an explicit plan for PMS integration sequencing. A realistic well-scoped implementation for a 10-property group runs 4–9 months. Vendors who compress that timeline without explaining what is being deferred are shifting risk onto your team, not removing it.

Each of these red flags maps to a category of post-implementation regret that appears repeatedly in multi-location financial reporting evaluations: buyers who accepted ambiguous answers during the sales process and discovered the gaps only after go-live, when the close process was already live and the leverage was gone.

How to choose the right hospitality ERP for your group

The right platform depends on your property count, ownership structure, and whether your primary pain point is multi-entity consolidation, USALI compliance, PMS integration, or some combination of all three. The scenarios below are written so you can self-identify — each one maps a specific operational situation to the platform most likely to fit.

If you are a multi-property management company replacing fragmented, property-level accounting tools — spreadsheets per property, disconnected AP workflows, no unified portfolio view — consider Flow ERP. Its AI-native multi-entity architecture handles intercompany eliminations and consolidated reporting natively, and LiveFlow's parent company holds a 4.9/5 stars on G2, with customers citing real-time data sync as the most impactful capability. Not ideal for: groups that need deep property management functionality or USALI reporting out of the box without hospitality-specific configuration.

If you are managing portfolio reporting across 10 or more properties with management fee complexity and ownership group reporting requirements, consider Sage Intacct or Flow ERP. Sage Intacct's dimensional model lets you slice consolidated financials by property, entity, or ownership group from a single dataset — a genuine operational advantage when you are reporting to multiple stakeholders with different views of the same portfolio. Not ideal for: groups that need USALI-native reporting without significant configuration work.

If you are a large enterprise hotel group with global operations, complex corporate structures, or international subsidiaries, consider NetSuite or Infor CloudSuite Hospitality. NetSuite's OneWorld module handles multi-subsidiary consolidation and multi-currency at scale; Infor brings the deepest USALI compliance and F&B cost control in the market. Not ideal for: mid-market groups where implementation timelines and total cost of ownership are the binding constraint.

If you are a mid-market group with significant food and beverage operations that need outlet-level cost tracking, Acumatica is worth evaluating, with Infor CloudSuite Hospitality as a higher-complexity consideration if F&B depth is the primary driver. Not ideal for: groups that need USALI-native reporting without partner-led customization.

If you are a small hotel group still running QuickBooks and not yet ready for a full ERP implementation, do not force a migration before the organization is operationally ready. A consolidation and FP&A layer like LiveFlow FP&A can extend the life of your current stack while you define requirements and prepare for a full transition — see the best multi-entity consolidation software for 2026 for a comparison of add-on tools that work above existing accounting systems.

If you are already in an active vendor evaluation, return to the red flags section above before advancing any platform to a final demo or contract stage. The scenarios here describe fit at the category level — the red flags checklist is where vendor-specific claims get tested against your actual requirements.

What to do next: matching your situation to the right platform

Where you are in the buying process determines what you should do with this guide. Three distinct situations apply to most readers at this point, and each has a different logical next step.

If you are in an active vendor evaluation right now, the most valuable move is to return to the red flags checklist before your next demo. Vendors who cannot demo a live intercompany elimination, cannot name hospitality management company references at your property count, or describe USALI compliance as "configurable" without specifying what that configuration entails — those are disqualifying signals, not negotiating points. The platform comparison table earlier in this guide gives you a side-by-side view of where each platform's limitations surface most sharply; use it to structure your demo script rather than letting vendors control the agenda.

If you are earlier in the process and still defining requirements, start with the Five Multi-Property Hospitality Finance Requirements framework before you contact a single vendor. The framework — per-property P&L and consolidated portfolio reporting, USALI-compliant chart of accounts, PMS integration, management fee and intercompany accounting, and F&B outlet cost tracking — gives you a scoring lens that forces vendors to respond to your operational reality rather than their standard pitch. Groups that skip this step tend to evaluate on accounting functionality alone and discover the consolidation and intercompany gaps only after go-live.

If you are not yet ready for a full ERP implementation — still running QuickBooks across properties, managing close in spreadsheets, or operating fewer than four properties with a lean finance team — a full ERP replacement is likely premature. The more practical path is to evaluate a consolidation and FP&A layer that can extend your current tools while your organization builds the operational readiness for a full migration. Our guide to multi-location financial reporting software covers lighter-weight options suited to this stage.

One forward-looking observation worth holding: the hospitality ERP market is consolidating around platforms that can handle both the operational finance layer and the ownership reporting layer in a single system. Groups that evaluate on accounting functionality alone — without stress-testing consolidation workflows, intercompany elimination logic, and USALI reporting in the same demo — will find themselves back in the market within three years. The finance stack that serves a 5-property group well often breaks at 15. Build for where your portfolio is going, not where it is today. For a broader view of how multi-entity consolidation requirements evolve with scale, the best multi-entity consolidation software guide provides useful context on what that ceiling looks like in practice.

What to do next: matching your situation to the right platform

Choosing the best hospitality ERP software for multi-property groups ultimately comes down to three variables: how many properties you operate, whether your management company and ownership entities are legally separate, and how much configuration work your team can absorb before go-live. Infor CloudSuite Hospitality leads on USALI depth at enterprise scale; Sage Intacct and Flow ERP are stronger fits for management companies navigating intercompany complexity across a growing portfolio; NetSuite and Acumatica serve groups with broader operational or cost-flexibility requirements.

The platform you select will shape your close process, your ownership reporting, and your consolidation workflow for years. If you are in an active evaluation, start with the red flags checklist and the platform comparison table before your next vendor demo. If you are still defining requirements, the Five Multi-Property Hospitality Finance Requirements framework is the right place to begin.

Frequently asked questions

What's the difference between hospitality ERP and a property management system?

A property management system (PMS) handles reservations, room inventory, guest profiles, and front-desk operations — it is an operational tool, not a financial one. A hospitality ERP manages the financial system of record: general ledger, accounts payable, accounts receivable, financial reporting, and multi-entity consolidation across properties. Most hotel groups need both systems running in parallel, connected via integration so that revenue and occupancy data captured in the PMS flows automatically into the ERP for financial processing. Neither system replaces the other — they serve distinct functions at different layers of the finance stack.

Do hotel management companies need different ERP software than ownership groups?

Yes, the requirements differ in meaningful ways. Management companies prioritize management fee calculation and invoicing, operator-level P&L by property, and consolidated reporting across a managed portfolio of assets they do not own. Ownership groups prioritize asset-level returns, distribution calculations, and reporting to investors or lenders. When the management company and ownership entity are separate legal entities — which is common in hospitality — intercompany transactions flow between them at month-end, and the ERP must handle both sets of requirements simultaneously rather than forcing a choice between them.

How do multi-property hotel groups handle intercompany management fees in their ERP?

Management fees are typically calculated as a percentage of revenue or gross operating profit, invoiced from the management company entity to the ownership entity, and then eliminated in consolidation so they do not double-count in portfolio-level reporting. For example, a management company charging a 3% base fee on $2M in monthly portfolio revenue generates $60,000 in intercompany invoices that must be eliminated before the consolidated P&L is presented to the ownership group. An ERP that supports this natively will automate the intercompany invoice, the elimination entry, and the per-entity reporting — removing the manual journal entries that make month-end unmanageable at scale across 10 or more properties.

What is USALI and which ERP platforms support it natively?

USALI — the Uniform System of Accounts for the Lodging Industry — is a standardized financial reporting framework that organizes hotel revenue and expenses by department: Rooms, Food & Beverage, Spa, Undistributed Operating Expenses, and Fixed Charges. It is the industry standard for hotel P&L presentation and is expected by asset managers, lenders, and ownership groups. Among the platforms covered in this guide, Infor CloudSuite Hospitality supports USALI natively with a pre-built chart of accounts structure; Sage Intacct, NetSuite, and Acumatica support it through configuration, which adds implementation time and ongoing maintenance risk; Flow ERP supports it through hospitality-specific setup. "Configurable" is not the same as "native" — buyers should ask vendors exactly how many implementation hours USALI configuration requires before accepting a general assurance.

How long does a hospitality ERP implementation typically take for a 10-property group?

For a 10-property group, a well-scoped hospitality ERP implementation typically takes 4–9 months, depending on data migration complexity, PMS integration requirements, and whether the chart of accounts must be built from scratch. Phased rollouts — going live with core GL and AP first, then layering in PMS integrations and consolidation reporting — are common and reduce operational disruption during peak periods. Any vendor promising completion in under 90 days for a multi-property group without a clearly documented phased methodology and named milestones should be treated as a red flag, not a differentiator.

Can a multi-property hotel group use QuickBooks, or does the complexity require a full ERP?

QuickBooks is a workable starting point for a single-property operator, but it breaks down quickly for multi-property groups. The core limitations are the absence of native multi-entity consolidation, no USALI-native chart of accounts, and no PMS integration architecture designed for portfolio-level reporting — groups managing three or more properties with separate legal entities typically hit that ceiling within 12–18 months of growth. For groups not yet ready for a full ERP migration, a consolidation and FP&A layer can extend the operational life of QuickBooks while the organization prepares for a full platform transition.

‍